Did you know…
…what food was eaten in medieval Russia?
It is simple enough to deduce what foods were not part of the diet, since some staples of modern Russian cuisine are New World foods: potatoes, tomatoes, corn, green peppers.
And some standard foodstuffs are as old as the land (or almost): rye, wheat, millet, barley, oats. These grains were used predominantly to prepare sourdough bread. Buckwheat was introduced only in the XV century, but as we know, it has become one of the most common foods in Russian cuisine.
Grains were also used to prepare a variety of porridges (“kasha” refers to a porridge-like dish, not to buckwheat only). These porridges could be sweet or savory, a meal in themselves or a side dish.
Domestically produced meat included beef, pork and mutton, in order of importance. Chickens (and eggs), geese, ducks, and even cranes (!) made up domestic fowl. Game and venison comprised just about every kind of available animal, from hares and squirrels, to deer and wild boar.
Only bear meat was off limits: some scholars suggest that is was because of an ancient bear-cult, but there is no strong evidence to support their theory.
Horse meat was not eaten, except in times of famine. In fact, the eating of horse meat was often used, in the Chronicles, to illustrate the severity of the famine, or the cruelty of a siege.
From cow milk, Russians obtained butter, cheese (both hard and soft, the latter of the cottage cheese kind, probably), and probably some kind of buttermilk. A dish still known today, and possible only because of the type of oven used by the Russians, is “baked milk” — milk placed in a warm oven and left all day until it acquires a brown crust. I have no idea how that tastes: I have never had a Russian oven!
Fish was a major staple, both because of its abundance and because of the numerous fast days in the Eastern Orthodox calendar in which all animal products were proscribed, including butter, milk, cheese. Fish is not an animal, and Russians found a variety of ways of serving it. Close to twenty species of fish, mostly freshwater, have been identified as part of the medieval Russian diet.
The list of vegetables is not as long, and includes the inevitable cabbage, onions, garlic, and turnips. It also comprises cucumbers, carrots, string beans. Pumpkins and beans are mentioned in XIV century sources. Walnuts were imported from Greece, as the political situation allowed, and so were almonds, and olives and olive oil. The forest provided hazelnuts, mushrooms, and berries (wood strawberries, bilberries, gooseberries, raspberries, blackberries…). Fruits were grown in orchards: sweet and tart cherries, apples, currant, plums, pears.
Spices and seasonings, used in Russian cooking many imported from Byzantium and the East, included vinegar, cinnamon, mint, anise, pepper, linseed oil, salt, dill, poppy seed. The principal sweetener was honey. Honey was also used to prepare mead, both sweet and dry, and also some kind of unfermented mead. Beer was brewed, as well as kvas, a bread-based beverage with a very low alcohol level: to this day, it is considered non-alcoholic by Russians. Wine was imported from Byzantium, Flanders, Hungary, and wherever merchants might have roamed.
Food preparation was determined by the peculiarities of the Russian oven: it had to be baked, simmered, stewed, boiled, in other words, it must have consisted of stews, casseroles, pies, soups, but not (or very little) of poached, fried, sautéed foods — those that require an open flame. However, recipes are almost non-existent, and if you could put together all the instructions on food preparation from period texts, you still would not have enough to prepare a feast. But at least, we know most ingredients!
(taken from Masha Holl's 'Medieval Russia' project)
Showing posts with label history. Show all posts
Showing posts with label history. Show all posts
1907-1915. Russia Before the Revolution, in Color
I stumbled upon this amazing article a while ago and faced the choosing issue.
How to choose a photo which could recommend you to follow the link if it's in the zone of your interest?
http://mashable.com/2014/09/30/russian-revolution-in-color/
So I've decided not to choose any. They are too diverse (as people of the Russian empire always were) and you can look by yourself.
I'll just leave the thought here.
The country never stays the same. It changes, survives, freshens, moves, breathes. As a person.
But many people I know would like to live then. In Russia before revolution. Just to cherish many things that've been demolished and harmfully united into a communist state.
But life knows no other, so we live only now.
Happily, some people make photos so we can at least stare at the faces of people who saw different Russia.
How to choose a photo which could recommend you to follow the link if it's in the zone of your interest?
http://mashable.com/2014/09/30/russian-revolution-in-color/
So I've decided not to choose any. They are too diverse (as people of the Russian empire always were) and you can look by yourself.
I'll just leave the thought here.
The country never stays the same. It changes, survives, freshens, moves, breathes. As a person.
But many people I know would like to live then. In Russia before revolution. Just to cherish many things that've been demolished and harmfully united into a communist state.
But life knows no other, so we live only now.
Happily, some people make photos so we can at least stare at the faces of people who saw different Russia.
A ’7 Up’ Series for Russia, With Soviet Roots
“Born in the USSR” is an award-winning documentary series that started out as the Soviet version of British director Michael Apted’s “7 Up,” the project that has followed a group of children starting at age 7 and checked in with them every seven years.
Mr. Apted chose Sergei Miroshnichenko, who had been expelled from film school in Moscow in the 1970s and sent to Sverdlovsk, then a closed military-industrial city, to direct the Soviet series in the late 1980s and he has been with the project ever since. That includes the latest installment, which is screening (with English subtitles) on Friday at Tribeca Cinemas as part of the sixth annual Russian Documentary Film Festival.
“Of course, this is a daughter of Michael Apted’s project,” Mr. Miroshnichenko said by phone as he headed to the airport for his Moscow-to-New York flight. (He will participate in a post-screening question-and-answer session.) “But she has grown and gone a bit on her own path,” shaped by the collapse of the Soviet Union and its reverberations. Mr. Miroshnichenko has two daughters who were young children when the project began and now work on it with him.
The second installment of “Born in the USSR” won an International Emmy Award for best documentary in 1999. The project almost fell apart for lack of money after the Soviet collapse until British financing was found. The bulk of the budget for the latest installment, which cost about $1 million, came from a mix of private Russian sponsors, Russian government entities and British and German partners.
The series is full of echoes of the past and foreshadows of events to come, giving it a Tolstoyan depth. It also has a geographical sweep — its subjects are now spread across the former Soviet states and around the world (in Israel, Argentina, Europe and the United States) — that distinguishes it from “My Perestroika,” an acclaimed 2010 documentary. That film, by an American, Robin Hessman, took a look at a group of 40-something Muscovites who spent half their lives in the Soviet Union and now live in Vladimir Putin’s Russia.
“Born in the USSR” follows 18 subjects. Among them is Anton, who is from an elite family of journalists, including a grandfather who was an editor of the Soviet Communist Party newspaper Pravda. At age 7 in 1990 he was asked what he thought awaited the Soviet Union. At the time, he spoke with earnest prescience as he predicted, “There will probably be a coup.”
Fast-forward to 2011, and Anton is a 28-year-old yuppie working as an editor at the Russian edition of Men’s Health magazine, churning out stories about sex and openly disenchanted with Russian politics. He is concerned primarily with creating a safe, comfortable and moral life for his wife and two young children. Just a few months later, young Moscow professionals like him would join mass anti-government protests.
Another subject of “Born in the USSR,” Andrei, was orphaned as a boy and by the second series had been adopted in the United States. But his first adoptive mother rejected him, and he was taken in by another family. In an on-camera statement, he refused to participate in the latest series. Mr. Miroshnichenko said that he hoped to film Andrei again later and made it clear that he did not support the official Russian ban on adoption by Americans.
Surprisingly, the film was shown on the Kremlin-controlled Rossiya state channel, even though Mr. Miroshnichenko asked one of his subjects whether Russia would survive as a country, a question now asked frequently in Russia but also often officially taboo.
“It was filmed before Bolotnaya,” he said referring to the site of major demonstrations in late 2011 and early 2012. “But you can already feel that people are unhappy about things. People had reason to be unhappy. I think that people who are always happy with everything are foolish people or deluded.”
from "The New York Times" blogs
Lucky we are, with all the series of this amazing film on YouTube. I've seen and liked them and totally recommend.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
